Friday, August 9, 2013

The 15 deadly sins of Bible study that lead to suppository preaching (Because the sermons really stink)


Do you know what a suppository is?  It is a type of medicine that inserted into your rectum that serves many purposes, most commonly as a laxative.  Gross I know.  It is with this in mind that I say many sermons are suppository in nature.  These sermons are painful spiritual laxatives of the mouth that perverts the true intention of the Bible[1].  Ouch! That sounds painful, not only for the pastor but for the congregation.  Christians should not stand for suppository sermons within the church.  But these types of sermons still happen.  Why?  I believe that it is simply because they commit one out of the 15 deadly sins of Bible study; these sins restrict the ability of the Christian to see the text authentically.  These 15 sins are normally called ‘eisegesis.’  If your pastor commits eisegesis on a regular basis he is not an expositor - he is a suppositor!

·         Reading my experience into the text:  This is allowing your experience to trump the authority of the text, and determining the meaning of any given text by what has happened to you. 

·         Too much trust in a particular English translation:  This happens when the student falls short of due diligence in study and blindly accepts the wording of one translation as being the only rendering of the text. 

·         Acceptance of someone else’s interpretation:  This happens when someone takes the word of a given theologian, pastor, friend, scholar, church, etc. instead of searching the scripture on one’s own. 

·         Reading my culture into the text:  This is when I read my particular cultural views into the text.  For example, my cultural view of slavery into another cultures view of slavery.  

·         Reading my philosophical axioms into the text:  When I take my philosophical axioms and make the text form to them. 

·         Misreading of the text:  This happens when the student skims the text and simply miss-reads what the author is saying. 

·         Failure to read the context:  This is when the student reads a verse and not the surrounding verses, and then makes the surrounding verses conform to that one particular verse.

·         Protecting a position or a sin:  When a student has a sin or a theological position and makes a text as a justification of their views. 

·         Loving to entertain “New Ideas”:  This happens when a student is only interested with something that has never been heard before. Thus, the new trumps the old without serious consideration.  This also happens when someone changes theological persuasion or attempts to make profound interpretations. 

·         Wanting to be a mystic:  A mystic is someone who receives intuitive revelation from God, thus, a student can easily allow that ‘intuitive’ voice inside to influence the meaning of any text. 

·         Arrogance:  This happens when the student thinks too highly of himself, and assumes that every word written was written specifically for him.  They completely disregard the original author, audience, and intent of the text.  This also exhibits itself when someone assumes that they always see the text correctly and is never willing to challenge their interpretations with the context. 

·         Seeking application:  This happens when the student does not care about what the text means, only an easy how-to manual to live their life.  For example, looking at the ten plagues in Egypt and asking, “What are the plagues that I need to overcome in my life?”

·         Lost in the particulars:  This happens when a student gets lost in the individual words and they forget the entire context. 

·         Laziness:  This happens when a student does not want to do the due diligence needed to understand the text, so they simply don’t try. 
Seeing a theme that is not there:  Many exegetes commit the sin of seeing a theme that threads itself throughout the entire Bible, and then interprets every text with that theme in mind.


[1] As you can tell I think a lot about how we as Christians understand the Bible.  I am suggesting that understanding the text is one of the highest priorities of the church; not the only priority but is one of the biggest.  Yet, I am so amazed at the sermons that pass for being “biblical.”  And I suppose that in a way, really bad bible study can lead to some dynamic sermons.  How else do we attribute the growth of Creflo Dollar, Benny Hinn, and their friends?  I am not one to rock the boat, but if we are heading down a waterfall I will warn the skipper.  I believe that the church is about to fall off the waterfall!

No comments:

Post a Comment